Current evidence is insufficient for assessing balance of benefits and harms of screening on health outcomes
By Elana Gotkine HealthDay Reporter
WEDNESDAY, June 26, 2024 (HealthDay News) — The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) concludes that the current evidence is insufficient for recommending screening for food insecurity in the primary care setting. These findings form the basis of a draft recommendation statement published online June 25.
Researchers from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in Rockville, Maryland, examined the evidence on the benefits and harms of screening for and interventions to ameliorate food insecurity. A total of 39 studies, with 198,762 participants, were included in the review. The researchers found that in one randomized clinical trial with 789 participants that examined the impact of screening for food insecurity, there was no difference observed between the groups in the percent reporting food insecurity after six months (29.6 and 29.8 percent in the intervention and usual-care groups, respectively). In 10 accuracy studies, two-item screeners typically had sensitivity above 95 percent and specificity above 82 percent. The lowest accuracy was seen for the one-item screener, with sensitivity and specificity of 0.59 and 0.87, respectively.
Based on these findings, the USPSTF concludes that for children, adolescents, and adults, the current evidence is insufficient for assessing the balance of benefits and harms of screening for food insecurity on health outcomes in the setting of primary care (I statement).
The draft evidence review and draft recommendation statement have been posted for public comment. Comments can be submitted from June 25 to July 22, 2024.
Draft Evidence Review
Draft Recommendation Statement
Comment on Recommendation Statement
Copyright © 2024 HealthDay. All rights reserved.
